Unlocks exact competitor prompt citation ranks, /llms-full.txt corpus & JSON-LD entity patches
AI Search Visibility Leaderboard: Autonomous AI IDEs & Coding Agents
Live 2026 AI Search Citation Share-of-Voice (cSoV) benchmark for AI Coding Tools. Compare Cursor (40.4%), GitHub Copilot (25.8%), Claude Code (20.9%), and Windsurf (12.9%) across ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, and Gemini.
Answer-First Executive Summary (AI Coding Tools)
Across 25 unbranded commercial buyer prompts in AI Coding Tools, Cursor leads AI answer engine visibility with 40.4% weighted Citation Share-of-Voice (cSoV), followed by GitHub Copilot (25.8%), Claude Code (20.9%), and Windsurf (12.9%). Brands with a valid root /llms.txt manifest and explicit PerplexityBot + OAI-SearchBot permissions captured 2.4x more rank #1 citations.
| Rank | Brand | Domain | Weighted cSoV | /llms.txt Status | JSON-LD Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Cursor | cursor.com | 40.4% | Active (/llms.txt + /llms-full.txt) | 94/100 |
| #2 | GitHub Copilot | githubcopilot.com | 25.8% | Partial (/llms.txt only) | 84/100 |
| #3 | Claude Code | claudecode.com | 20.9% | Missing (404) | 76/100 |
| #4 | Windsurf | windsurf.com | 12.9% | Missing (404) | 68/100 |
Deploying a spec-compliant /llms.txt and SoftwareApplication + FAQPage JSON-LD graph is the highest-leverage engineering move to overtake Cursor and GitHub Copilot in AI Coding Tools prompts.
Run a Live 10-Second GEO Audit on Your Own Domain
Compare your cSoV against Cursor and auto-compile your custom /llms.txt + JSON-LD graph.